My client was involved in a collision. He was subsequently arrested in Austin, Texas for DWI by the Austin Police Department.
My client PROVIDED A BREATH TEST. My client didnâ€™t know he could refuse the tests. The officer reported that my client had a strong odor of alcohol coming from his breath. The officer reported that he had bloodshot and glassy eyes. He provided two breath specimens with a reported BAC of .131 and .129.
My client also did the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs). The Officer said my client exhibited all 6 clues of intoxication on the HGN (eye jerking) test. The Officer said that my client displayed 7 of the 8 clues of intoxication on the Walk & Turn test. The Officer said that my client swayed, hopped and put his foot down numerous times on the One Leg Stand test.
We appealed the so called “automatic” suspension of his driver’s license. We filed discovery requests and subpoenaed all the officers involved to justify our client’s arrest and the suspension.
We argued to the ALR judge that DPS couldnâ€™t prove all the necessary elements necessary to suspend my clientâ€™s license. The judge ruled that we were correct and denied DPSâ€™ request to suspend my clientâ€™s license. His LICENSE WAS NOT SUSPENDED.