My client was arrested for DWI in Austin, Texas by an officer with the Austin Police Department. The officer stopped my client because the officer said that my client ran a flashing red light and struck a curb.
My client PROVIDED A BREATH TEST. My client didnâ€™t know he could refuse the tests. The officer reported that my client had a strong odor of alcohol coming from his breath. He provided two breath specimens with a reported BAC of .161 and .162.
My client also did the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs). The Officer said my client exhibited 6 of the 6 clues of intoxication on the HGN (eye jerking) test. The Officer said that my client displayed 4 of the 8 clues of intoxication on the Walk & Turn test. The Officer said that my client swayed and used his arms for balance on the One Leg Stand test.
We appealed the so called “automatic” suspension of her driver’s license.
We filed discovery requests and subpoenaed all the officers involved to justify our client’s arrest and the suspension.We argued to the ALR judge that DPS couldnâ€™t prove all the necessary elements necessary to suspend my clientâ€™s license. The judge ruled that we were correct and denied DPSâ€™ request to suspend my clientâ€™s license. His LICENSE WAS NOT SUSPENDED.